US6143903AExpiredUtility
Process for the production of enantiomerically-pure azetidine-2-carboxylic acid
Est. expiryApr 26, 2016(expired)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
C07D 205/04C07B 57/00
26
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
25
References
18
Claims
Abstract
The invention relates to a process for the production of enantiomerically-pure AzeOH which comprises selective crystallisation of a diastereomerically-pure AzeOH-tartrate salt from a homogeneous solution of AzeOH, optically-active tartaric acid, an organic acid and an aldehyde, followed by liberation of the free amino acid.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWhat is claimed is:
1. A process for the production of enantiomerically-pure AzeOH which comprises: (a) selective crystallisation of a diastereomerically-pure AzeOH-tartrate salt from a homogeneous solution of AzeOH, optically-active tartaric acid, an organic acid and an aldehyde; followed by (b) liberation of the free amino acid.
2. A process for the conversion of one enantiomer of AzeOH to the other which comprises: (a) for conversion of D-AzeOH to L-AzeOH, selective crystallisation of a diastereomerically-pure L-AzeOH-D-tartrate salt from a homogeneous solution of D-AzeOH, D-tartaric acid, an organic acid and an aldehyde, followed by liberation of the free amino acid; or (b) for conversion of L-AzeOH to D-AzeOH, selective crystallisation of a diastereomerically-pure D-AzeOH-L-tartrate salt from a homogeneous solution of L-AzeOH, L-tartaric acid, an organic acid and an aldehyde, followed by liberation of the free amino acid.
3. A process as claimed in claims 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the organic acid is used as solvent.
4. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, characterised in that the organic acid is a C 1-8 mono- or difunctional carboxylic acid.
5. A process as claimed in claim 4, characterised in that the organic acid is formic acid or acetic acid.
6. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, characterised in that the aldehyde is a C 3-8 mono- or difunctional aldehyde.
7. A process as claimed in claim 6, characterised in that the aldehyde is butyric aldehyde or caproic aldehyde.
8. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, characterised in that the molar ratio of aldehyde to enantiomerically-enriched AzeOH is in the range 0.01:1.0 to 1.0:1.0.
9. A process as claimed in claim 8, characterised in that the molar ratio is in the range 0.01:1.0 to 0.2:1.0.
10. A process as claimed in claim 9, characterised in that the molar ratio is in the range 0.05:1.0 to 0.1:1.0.
11. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, characterised in that the molar ratio of L- or D-tartaric acid to azetidine-2-carboxylic acid in the range 0.5:1.0 to 2.0:1.0.
12. A process as claimed in claim 11, characterised in that the molar ratio is in the range 0.6:1.0 to 1.1:1.0.
13. A process as claimed in claim 12, characterised in that the molar ratio is in the range 0.8:1.0 to 1.0 to 1.0.
14. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, characterised in that the selective crystallisation is achieved by cooling to a temperature in the range -10 to 30° C.
15. A process as claimed in claim 14, characterised in that the temperature is in the range -5 to 10° C.
16. A process as claimed to claim 15, characterised in that the temperature is in the range 0 to 5° C.
17. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16, characterised in that the free amino acid is liberated by displacement of tartaric acid using calcium chloride.
18. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16, characterised in that the free amino acid is liberated by displacement of tartaric acid using potassium hydroxide.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US6143903A — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.