System and method for identification, assessment, and management of business valuation and business risk
Abstract
Systems and methods to identify, assess, and manage business risk and increase business valuation and marketability are provided. In one aspect, business risk is determined in response to user responses to a set of business queries. In one embodiment, a method to mitigate business risk includes receiving company data and a set of user-provided answers to a set of business queries, each of the set of user-provided answers having a weighted value and a prioritized ranking value; categorizing the set of user-provided answers into a set of response categories; generating a score for each response category; dividing the set of business queries into two business categories; calculating a set of score weight values for each user-provided answer; and calculating a total score weight for each business category; and generating a risk prioritization list along with tactics to address such risks.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWhat is claimed is:
1 . A method for automatically calculating an interactive business valuation score relative to peer companies using business transaction risk data, the method comprising:
receiving, by a graphical user interface (GUI) of a logic engine executing on a processor of a computer system, a plurality of user-provided answers to a set of business queries; quantizing, by the logic engine, each of the user-provided answers within a set of tranches to generate a plurality of quantized user-provided answers; accessing, by the logic engine, a data storage device having a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a plurality of business transaction risk data associated with the set of business queries, the plurality of business transaction risk data comprising a set of risk factors; automatically calculating, by the logic engine, a plurality of quantized weighted answer values associated with the plurality of quantized user-provided answers and the set of risk factors; searching, by the logic engine, the data storage device to map each of the quantized weighted answer values to one or more business transaction risk data stored on the data storage device to identify a plurality of identified business transaction risks; ranking, by the logic engine, the plurality of identified business transaction risks to automatically generate a risk prioritization list, the ranking based at least on a set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the risk prioritization list; automatically calculating, by the logic engine, a business valuation score based at least on: i) the risk prioritization list, and ii) the set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the business valuation score relative to peer companies on a GUI display; receiving, by the GUI of the logic engine, a re-ordering of the identified business transaction risks of the risk prioritization list to create a revised risk prioritization list; automatically re-calculating, by the logic engine, the business valuation score using the revised risk prioritization list to generate a revised business valuation score; and rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the revised business valuation score relative to peer companies on a revised GUI display.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the GUI display is a price prediction graph automatically calculated, by the logic engine, at least using the plurality of business transaction risk data stored in the data storage device and the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the business transaction risk data are qualitative business transaction risk data.
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of risk factors are at least a set of four risk factors and the set of tranches are at least a set of five tranches.
5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the set of four risk factors include at least two of the following four risk factors associated with: importance to deal value, cost to fix, ability to fix, and risk to fix.
6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of, after calculating the business valuation score, updating the plurality of business transaction risk data stored in the data storage device based on the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of business queries includes at least four business queries associated with: geographic markets, cyclicality, manufacturing, owner dependence, products-services, depth-quality, owner dependence, unionization, and market position.
8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of generating, by the logic engine, a listing of potential fixes for a particular identified business transaction risk, the particular identified business transaction risk selected by a user by way of the GUI, the listing of potential fixes based at least on the business transaction risk data and the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tranches map to numeric integer values; the data storage device is a remote data storage device at least partly implemented on the cloud; and
the GUI is associated with a user app.
10 . A method of automatically calculating an interactive business valuation score relative to peer companies using business transaction risk data, the method comprising:
receiving, by a graphical user interface (GUI) of a logic engine executing on a processor of a computer system, a plurality of user-provided answers to a set of business queries; quantizing, by the logic engine, each of the user-provided answers within a set of tranches to generate a plurality of quantized user-provided answers; accessing, by the logic engine, a data storage device having a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a plurality of business transaction risk data associated with the set of business queries, the plurality of business transaction risk data comprising a set of risk factors; automatically calculating, by the logic engine, a plurality of quantized weighted answer values associated with the plurality of quantized user-provided answers and the set of risk factors; searching, by the logic engine, the data storage device to map each of the quantized weighted answer values to one or more business transaction risk data stored on the data storage device to identify a plurality of identified business transaction risks; ranking, by the logic engine, the plurality of identified business transaction risks to automatically generate a risk prioritization list, the ranking based at least on a set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the risk prioritization list; automatically calculating, by the logic engine, a business valuation score based at least on: i) the risk prioritization list, and ii) the set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the business valuation score relative to peer companies on a GUI display; and updating the plurality of business transaction risk data stored in the data storage device based on the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
11 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising the steps of:
receiving, by the GUI of the logic engine, a re-ordering of the identified business transaction risks of the risk prioritization list to create a revised risk prioritization list; automatically re-calculating, by the logic engine, the business valuation score using the revised risk prioritization list to generate a revised business valuation score; and rendering, by the GUI of the logic engine, the revised business valuation score relative to peer companies on a GUI display.
12 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising the step of: generating, by the logic engine, a listing of potential fixes for a particular identified business transaction risk, the particular identified business transaction risk selected by a user by way of the GUI, the listing of potential fixes based at least on the business transaction risk data and the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the business transaction risk data are qualitative business transaction risk data.
14 . A system for automatically calculating an interactive business valuation score relative to peer companies using business transaction risk data, the system comprising:
a logic engine comprising a computer processor; a graphical user interface (GUI) associated with the logic engine and executing on the computer processor, the GUI configured to receive a plurality of user-provided answers to a set of business queries; a data storage device having a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, the data storage device storing a plurality of business transaction risk data associated with the set of business queries, the plurality of business transaction risk data comprising a set of risk factors; wherein: the logic engine has machine-executable instructions operating to: quantize each of the user-provided answers within a set of tranches to generate a plurality of quantized user-provided answers; automatically calculate a plurality of quantized weighted answer values associated with the plurality of quantized user-provided answers and the set of risk factors; search the data storage device to map each of the quantized weighted answer values to one or more business transaction risk data stored on the data storage device to identify a plurality of identified business transaction risks; rank the plurality of identified business transaction risks to automatically generate a risk prioritization list, the ranking based at least on a set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; render, by the GUI, the risk prioritization list; automatically calculate a business valuation score based at least on: i) the risk prioritization list, and ii) the set of identified business transaction risk data associated with each identified business transaction risk; update the plurality of business transaction risk data stored in the data storage device based on the plurality of quantized user-provided answers; and render, by the GUI of the logic engine, the business valuation score relative to peer companies on a GUI display.
15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the logic engine further has machine-executable instructions operating to:
receive, by the GUI of the logic engine, a re-ordering of the identified business transaction risks of the risk prioritization list to create a revised risk prioritization list; automatically re-calculate the business valuation score using the revised risk prioritization list to generate a revised business valuation score; and render, by the GUI of the logic engine, the revised business valuation score relative to peer companies on a revised GUI display.
16 . The system of claim 14 , wherein:
the data storage device is a remote data storage device at least partly implemented on the cloud; and the GUI is associated with a user app.
17 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the GUI display is a price prediction graph automatically calculated, by the logic engine, at least using the plurality of business transaction risk data stored in the data storage device and the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
18 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the set of business queries includes at least four business queries associated with: geographic markets, cyclicality, manufacturing, owner dependence, products-services, depth-quality, owner dependence, unionization, and market position.
19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the logic engine further comprises machine-executable instructions operating to: generate a listing of potential fixes for a particular identified business transaction risk, the particular identified business transaction risk selected by a user by way of the GUI, the listing of potential fixes based at least on the business transaction risk data and the plurality of quantized user-provided answers.
20 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the set of risk factors include at least two of the following risk factors associated with: importance to deal value, cost to fix, ability to fix, and risk to fix; and the tranches map to numeric integer values.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2023019263A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.