Systems and methods for intelligent adherence or conformance analysis coaching

Abstract

A system and method for intelligent adherence analysis/conformance analysis coaching where a graphical user interface, which allows a supervisor to select a date range and an objective, such as a goal amount of adherence/conformance to occur at a goal frequency, is displayed; adherence/conformance data, for one or more agents, is received, agents are determined to require coaching based on a comparison of the adherence/conformance data at the goal frequency to the goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of adherence/conformance at the goal frequency; coaching sessions are scheduled with each of the agents determined to require coaching; and an alert, which includes information indicating why the agent requires coaching, is transmitted to each of those agents.

1 . An intelligent adherence analysis coaching system comprising:
 a monitor; and   one or more processors configured to:
 receive, for one or more agents, adherence data wherein the adherence data comprises, for each of one or more scheduled activities during a date range, an amount of time in adherence or an amount of time not in adherence determined by comparing scheduled activities against actual activities; 
 determine if any of the one or more agents requires coaching based on a comparison of the adherence data to a goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of adherence; and 
 transmit an alert to each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching, wherein the alert comprises information indicating why the agent has been determined to require coaching. 
   
     
     
         2 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein the adherence data comprises, for each of one or more dates in the date range, for each of the one or more agents, a percentage of adherence for the agent based on a comparison of:
 a sum of the amount of time the agent was in adherence or a sum of the amount of time the agent was not in adherence for each of the scheduled activities on that date, and   a sum of the scheduled total amount of time for each of the scheduled activities on that date.   
     
     
         3 . The system of  claim 2 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine if any of the one or more agents require coaching by, for each of the one or more agents:
 determining an amount of nonadherence days in the date range that the percentage of adherence is less than or equal to the goal amount of adherence, and   determining if the amount of nonadherence days at a goal frequency is greater than or equal to the goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of adherence at the goal frequency.   
     
     
         4 . The system of  claim 3 , wherein the one or more processor is configured to schedule coaching sessions for agents and, for each of the one or more agents that have been scheduled for a coaching session, cancel the coaching session if:
 an amount of nonadherence days during a predetermined subsequent period of time is less than a first predetermined threshold; or   a difference between the amount of nonadherence days during the predetermined subsequent period of time at a goal frequency and the amount of nonadherence days during the date range at the goal frequency is less than a second predetermined threshold;   wherein the predetermined subsequent period of time is between after the date range ends and a time that the agent was scheduled for the coaching session.   
     
     
         5 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein one or more processors is configured so that the graphical user interface displays, for each of the of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching:
 a result of the comparison of the objective and the adherence data,   a link, which when clicked, causes the one or more processors to display the report in the graphical user interface,   a schedule of the agent's coaching session scheduled for the agent, and   a link, which when clicked, allows the supervisor to reschedule or cancel the agent's coaching session.   
     
     
         6 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein comparing scheduled activities against actual activities is based on a comparison of scheduled times to actual activity times. 
     
     
         7 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to schedule a coaching session with agents that have been determined to require coaching. 
     
     
         8 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to display a graphical user interface on the monitor which allows a supervisor to select a date range and an objective, wherein the objective is a goal amount of occurrences of a goal amount of adherence to occur at a goal frequency. 
     
     
         9 . An intelligent conformance analysis coaching system comprising:
 a monitor; and   one or more processors configured to:
 receive, for one or more agents, conformance data, wherein the conformance data comprises, for each of one or more scheduled activities during a date range, an amount of time in conformance or an amount of time not in conformance; 
 determine if any of the one or more agents requires coaching based on a comparison of the conformance data to a goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of conformance; and 
 transmit an alert to each of the one or more agents that has been determined to require coaching, wherein the alert comprises information indicating why the agent has been determined to require coaching. 
   
     
     
         10 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein the conformance data further comprises, for each of one or more dates in the date range, for each of the one or more agents, a percentage of conformance for the agent based on a comparison of a sum of the actual total amount of time each of the scheduled activities were actually performed by the agent and a sum of the scheduled total amount of time for each of the scheduled activities on that date. 
     
     
         11 . An intelligent adherence analysis coaching method comprising:
 receiving, for one or more agents, adherence data or conformance data, wherein the adherence data comprises, for each of one or more scheduled activities during a date range, an amount of time in adherence or an amount of time not in adherence determined by comparing scheduled activities against actual activities;   determining if any of the one or more agents requires coaching based on a comparison of the adherence data to a goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of adherence; and   transmitting an alert to each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching, wherein the alert comprises information indicating why the agent has been determined to require coaching.   
     
     
         12 . The method of  claim 11 , wherein the adherence data comprises, for each of one or more dates in the date range, for each of the one or more agents, a percentage of adherence for the agent based on a comparison of:
 a sum of the amount of time the agent was in adherence or a sum of the amount of time the agent was not in adherence for each of the scheduled activities on that date, and   a sum of the scheduled total amount of time for each of the scheduled activities on that date.   
     
     
         13 . The method of  claim 12 , comprising to allowing the supervisor to select, through the graphical user interface, for each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching, whether to transmit the report along with the alert to that agent. 
     
     
         14 . The method of  claim 11 , comprising displaying, through the graphical user interface, for each of the of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching:
 a result of the comparison of the objective and the adherence data or the conformance data,   a link, which when clicked, displays the report in the graphical user interface,   a schedule of the agent's coaching session scheduled for the agent, and   a link, which when clicked, allows the supervisor to reschedule or cancel the agent's coaching session.   
     
     
         15 . The method of  claim 11 , comprising, for each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching, determining at least one proposed date and time for the coaching based on the agent's work schedule and net staffing during the at least one proposed date and time. 
     
     
         16 . The method of  claim 11 , wherein the comparing scheduled activities against actual activities comprises comparing scheduled times to actual activity times. 
     
     
         17 . The method of  claim 11 , comprising scheduling a coaching session with each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching. 
     
     
         18 . The method of  claim 11 , comprising displaying a graphical user interface which allows a supervisor to select a date range and an objective, wherein the objective is a goal amount of occurrences of a goal amount of adherence to occur at a goal frequency. 
     
     
         19 . An intelligent conformance analysis coaching method comprising:
 receiving, for one or more agents, conformance data, wherein the conformance data comprises, for each of the one or more scheduled activities during a date range, an amount of time in conformance or an amount of time not in conformance determined by comparing scheduled activities against actual activities;   determining if any of the one or more agents require coaching based on a comparison of the conformance data to a goal amount of occurrences of the goal amount of conformance; and   transmitting an alert to each of the one or more agents that have been determined to require coaching, wherein the alert comprises information indicating why the agent has been determined to require coaching.   
     
     
         20 . The method of  claim 19 , wherein the conformance data further comprises, for each of one or more dates in the date range, for each of the one or more agents, a percentage of conformance for the agent based on a comparison of a sum of the actual total amount of time each of the scheduled activities were actually performed by the agent and a sum of the scheduled total amount of time for each of the scheduled activities on that date.