Transport dangerous situation consensus

Abstract

An example operation includes one or more of receiving data, by a transport, from a device in proximity to the transport, the data comprises one or more of a speed, a direction, and a distance of the device from the transport, determining, by the transport, a dangerous situation based on the data, obtaining consensus, by the transport, to validate the dangerous situation from one or more of: one or more other devices proximate to the transport, and one or more other transports proximate the transport, and notifying the device, by the transport, based on the consensus, the notification comprises the dangerous situation.

What is claimed is: 
     
         1 . A method, comprising:
 receiving data, by a transport, from a device in proximity to the transport, the data comprises one or more of a speed, a direction, and a distance of the device from the transport;   determining, by the transport, a dangerous situation based on the data;   obtaining consensus, by the transport, to validate the dangerous situation from one or more of:
 one or more other devices proximate to the transport; and 
 one or more other transports proximate to the transport; and 
   notifying the device, by the transport, based on the consensus, the notification comprises the dangerous situation.   
     
     
         2 . The method of  claim 1 , comprising:
 transmitting, by the transport, the data to a server,   wherein the server determines the dangerous situation, obtains consensus from the one or more other devices and the one or more other transports, and notifies one or more of the transport and the device.   
     
     
         3 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the determining is based on a speed and a direction of the transport and the speed and the direction of the device. 
     
     
         4 . The method of  claim 1 , comprising:
 detecting a movement pattern change of the device from the data, wherein the movement pattern change reflects a change from a pedestrian speed and direction to a transport occupant speed and direction; and   checking if an amber alert should be generated.   
     
     
         5 . The method of  claim 4 , comprising:
 providing, based on the checking, a notification to one of more other devices proximate to the device to initiate recording; and   initiating one or more of audio and video recording by the one or more other devices proximate to the device.   
     
     
         6 . The method of  claim 1 , comprising:
 providing an evasive action for the transport to take in order to reduce a chance of the transport impacting a user associated with the device.   
     
     
         7 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein notifying the device comprising:
 receiving, by the device, the notification and in response:   initiating, by the device, one or more of audio and video recording.   
     
     
         8 . A transport, comprising:
 a processor; and   a memory, coupled to the processor, comprising instructions that when executed by the processor are configured to:
 receive data, by the transport, from a device in proximity to the transport, the data comprises one or more of a speed, a direction, and a distance of the device from the transport; 
 determine, by the transport, a dangerous situation based on the data; 
 obtain consensus, by the transport, to validate the dangerous situation from one or more of:
 one or more other devices proximate to the transport; and 
 one or more other transports proximate to the transport; and 
 
 notify the device, by the transport, based on the consensus, the notification comprises the dangerous situation. 
   
     
     
         9 . The transport of  claim 8 , wherein the instructions are further configured to:
 transmit the data to a server,   wherein the server determines the dangerous situation, obtains consensus from the one or more other devices and the one or more other transports, and notifies one or more of the transport and the device.   
     
     
         10 . The transport of  claim 8 , wherein the transport determines a dangerous situation based on the data is based on a speed and a direction of the transport and the speed and the direction of the device. 
     
     
         11 . The transport of  claim 8 , wherein the transport is configured to:
 detect a movement pattern change of the device from the data, wherein the movement pattern change reflects a change from a pedestrian speed and direction to a transport occupant speed and direction; and   check if an amber alert should be generated.   
     
     
         12 . The transport of  claim 11 , wherein the transport is configured to:
 provide, based on the check, a notification to one or more other devices proximate to the device to record one or more of audio and video; and   record one or more of audio and video by the one or more other devices proximate to the device.   
     
     
         13 . The transport of  claim 8 , wherein the transport is configured to:
 receive an evasive action for the transport to take in order to reduce a chance of the transport impacting a user associated with the device.   
     
     
         14 . The transport of  claim 8 , wherein the transport is configured to:
 send the notification to the device, and in response:
 initiate, by the device, one or more of audio and video recording. 
   
     
     
         15 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions, that when read by a processor, cause the processor to perform:
 receiving data, by a transport, from a device in proximity to the transport, the data comprises one or more of a speed, a direction, and a distance of the device from the transport;   determining, by the transport, a dangerous situation based on the data;   obtaining consensus, by the transport, to validate the dangerous situation from one or more of:
 one or more other devices proximate to the transport; and 
 one or more other transports proximate o the transport; and 
   notifying the device, by the transport, based on the consensus, the notification comprises the dangerous situation.   
     
     
         16 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of  claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to perform:
 transmitting, by the transport, the data to a server,   wherein the server determines the dangerous situation, obtains consensus from the one or more other devices and the one or more other transports, and notifies one or more of the transport and the device.   
     
     
         17 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of  claim 15 , wherein the determining is based on a speed and a direction of the transport and the speed and the direction of the device. 
     
     
         18 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of  claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to perform:
 detecting a movement pattern change of the device from the data, wherein the movement pattern change reflects a change from a pedestrian speed and direction to a transport occupant speed and direction; and   checking if an amber alert should be generated,   providing, based on the checking, a notification to one or more other devices proximate to the device to initiate recording; and   initiating one or more of audio and video recording by the one or more other devices proximate to the device.   
     
     
         19 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of  claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to perform:
 providing an evasive action for the transport to take in order to reduce a chance of the transport impacting a user associated with the device.   
     
     
         20 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of  claim 15 , wherein notifying the device comprising:
 receiving, by the device, the notification and in response:
 initiating, by the device, one or more of audio and video recording.