System and Method for Quadratic, Near-Quadratic, and Convex Voting in Various Types of Research and Voting

Abstract

A method for eliciting and aggregating truthful preferences of respondents, with steps of assigning a currency budget to a respondent and generating a user interface. The user interface: displays budgets for each respondent; displays choices among alternative outcomes for each respondent and a method for allocating votes among options by paying according to a quadratic function; displays the outcome of the voting for each respondent; enables a third party to select and contact respondents; enables the third party to observe voting choices and final voting outcomes; and enables the third party to control budgets and voting options.

What is claimed is: 
     
         1 . A system for eliciting and aggregating the truthful preferences of a group of respondents, comprising:
 a server computer comprising a memory, a processor, and a plurality of programming instructions stored in the memory and operating on the processor, the plurality of programming instructions comprising at least a quadratic voting software component configured to:
 provide an administrative user interface for assigning a budget of artificial or real currency to a first respondent of the group of respondents; 
 provide a respondent user interface that:
 displays a set of choices among alternative outcomes for the first respondent and a method for allocating votes among the choices by paying with the budget according to a quadratic function; and 
 displays an outcome of the voting for the first respondent; 
 
 enable a third party to select a subset of the plurality of respondents and to contact the subset of respondents by email, text message, or other communication method with a link to a web page; 
 enable the third party to observe voting choices made by respondents and final voting outcomes; and 
 enable the third party to act via the administrative user interface. 
   
     
     
         2 . The system of  claim 1 , wherein a near-quadratic or convex cost of voting may be used, where:
 a near-quadratic cost of voting is a Taylor polynomial of a cost-vote relationship with small coefficients on all degree 3 and higher terms, and a convex cost of voting is a cost with a linear or close to linear derivative.   
     
     
         3 . The system of  claim 2 , wherein the quadratic-voting software component is further configured to:
 record every click that the first respondent makes while allocating currency to votes and revising decisions;   generate aggregate statistics using the recorded click data; and   reveal a set of choices that receive the most deliberation, and a strength of preference for various choices.   
     
     
         4 . The system of  claim 2 , where the respondent user interface comprises one or more of:
 a visual depiction of a device such as a slider, knob, spring, cord, or the like, which may be moved by touching a screen, wherein the device exhibits greater resistance according to a quadratic function as a user uses it to register a greater number of votes;   an acoustic component that emits a noise an acoustic volume of which varies according to a quadratic function as a greater number of votes are registered by the user; and   a visual depiction of a funnel, wherein a volume of liquid within the funnel represents units of currency and a height of a visual liquid level in the funnel represents a number of votes, wherein the funnel is shaped so that a quadratic relationship between votes cast and currency units is maintained.   
     
     
         5 . The system of  claim 4 , wherein the quadratic-voting software component is further configured to:
 generate a user interface that:
 enables the first respondent to communicate a proposal to other respondents by placing currency in an escrow account; and 
 allows other respondents to endorse the proposal by placing currency in the escrow account; and 
   adds the proposal as an alternative option to be voted on by respondents if currency placed in escrow exceeds a threshold level.   
     
     
         6 . A method for eliciting and aggregating the truthful preferences of a group of respondents, the method comprising the steps of:
 assigning, using a quadratic voting software component comprising programming instructions stored in a memory of, and operating on a processor of, a server computer comprising a memory and a processor, a budget of artificial or real currency to a respondent of the group of respondents; and   providing, using the quadratic voting software component, an administrative user interface for assigning a budget of artificial or real currency to a first respondent of the group of respondents;   providing, using the quadratic voting software component, a respondent user interface that:
 displays a set of choices among alternative outcomes for the first respondent and a method for allocating votes among the choices by paying with the budget according to a quadratic function; and 
 displays an outcome of the voting for the first respondent; 
   enabling, using the quadratic voting software component, a third party to select a subset of the plurality of respondents and to contact the subset of respondents by email, text message, or other communication method with a link to a web page;   enabling, using the quadratic voting software component, the third party to observe voting choices made by respondents and final voting outcomes; and   enabling, using the quadratic voting software component, the third party to act via the administrative user interface.   
     
     
         7 . The method of  claim 6 , wherein a near-quadratic or convex cost of voting may be used, where:
 a near-quadratic cost of voting is a Taylor polynomial of a cost-vote relationship with small coefficients on all degree 3 and higher terms, and   a convex cost of voting is a cost with a linear or close to linear derivative.   
     
     
         8 . The method of  claim 7 , wherein the method further comprises the steps of:
 recording every click that the first respondent makes while allocating currency to votes and revising decisions;   generating aggregate statistics using the recorded click data; and   revealing a set of choices that receive the most deliberation, and a strength of preference for various choices.   
     
     
         9 . The method of  claim 7 , wherein the respondent user interface comprises one or more of:
 a visual depiction of a device such as a slider, knob, spring, cord, or the like, which may be moved by touching a screen, wherein the device exhibits greater resistance according to a quadratic function as a user uses it to register a greater number of votes;   an acoustic component that emits a noise an acoustic volume of which varies according to a quadratic function as a greater number of votes are registered by the user; and   a visual depiction of a funnel, wherein a volume of liquid within the funnel represents units of currency and a height of a visual liquid level in the funnel represents a number of votes, wherein the funnel is shaped so that a quadratic relationship between votes cast and currency units is maintained.   
     
     
         10 . The method of  claim 9 , wherein the quadratic-voting software component is further configured to:
 generate a user interface that:
 enables the first respondent to communicate a proposal to other respondents by placing currency in an escrow account; and 
 allows other respondents to endorse the proposal by placing currency in the escrow account; and 
   adds the proposal as an alternative option to be voted on by respondents if currency placed in escrow exceeds a threshold level.