US2014188532A1PendingUtilityA1
Multitenant Database Placement with a Cost Based Query Scheduler
Est. expiryNov 13, 2032(~6.3 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
G06F 9/4881G06F 9/5083G06Q 10/0631G06F 16/24547G06F 9/5038G06F 9/5072
44
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims
Abstract
Systems and methods are disclosed for placing tenants in a cloud based database server, by estimating with a processor a cost of placing a set of tenants on a server using a simulator; estimating a relative importance of different tenant's queries; and selecting an optimal server for each tenant based with a cost-based schedular to maximize profit using the simulator.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWhat is claimed is:
1 . A method for placing tenants in a cloud based database server, comprising:
estimating with a processor a cost of placing a set of tenants on a server using a simulator; estimating a relative importance of different tenant's queries; and selecting an optimal server for each tenant based with a cost-based schedular to maximize profit using the simulator.
2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising receiving a service level agreement (SLA) for mapping from tenants to servers
3 . The method of claim 1 , comprising simulating a mixed workload of all tenant's queries with a load.
4 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining an average cost per query of a tenant.
5 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining an average cost per query of tenant in a mixed workload.
6 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining an importance of a tenant based on an average cost per query of a tenant alone and an average cost per query of a tenant in a mixed workload.
7 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining an importance of a tenant i at a load x as:
imp
(
i
,
x
)
=
cost
alone
(
i
,
x
)
cost
together
(
i
,
x
)
.
8 . The method of claim 1 , comprising determining which tenant is more important by integrating a probability density function (PDF) of an aggregate load f(x) of load:
imp( i )=∫ r (x) imp( i,x )· f ( x ) dx
where r is approximately near one.
9 . The method of claim 1 , comprising estimating a cost of placing a tenant on a server using a simulator and placing the tenant on the server with the lowest incremental cost after adding the tenant.
10 . The method of claim 1 , comprising applying a worst fit strategy for tenant placement with an incremental cost-based scheduler (iCBS) and the simulator for cost balancing.
11 . A system for placing tenants in a cloud based database server, comprising:
estimating with a processor a cost of placing a set of tenants on a server using a simulator; estimating a relative importance of different tenant's queries; and selecting an optimal server for each tenant based with a cost-based schedular to maximize profit using the simulator.
12 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for receiving a service level agreement (SLA) for mapping from tenants to servers
13 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for simulating a mixed workload of all tenant's queries with a load.
14 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for determining an average cost per query of a tenant.
15 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for determining an average cost per query of tenant in a mixed workload.
16 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for determining an importance of a tenant based on an average cost per query of a tenant alone and an average cost per query of a tenant in a mixed workload.
17 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for determining an importance of a tenant i at a load x as:
imp
(
i
,
x
)
=
cost
alone
(
i
,
x
)
cost
together
(
i
,
x
)
.
18 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for determining which tenant is more important by integrating a probability density function (PDF) of an aggregate load f(x) of load:
imp( i )=∫ r (x) imp( i,x )· f ( x ) dx
19 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for estimating a cost of placing a tenant on a server using a simulator and placing the tenant on the server with the lowest incremental cost after adding the tenant.
20 . The system of claim 11 , comprising code for applying a worst fit strategy for tenant placement with an incremental cost-based scheduler (iCBS) and the simulator for cost balancing.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2014188532A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.