3d object delineation
Abstract
Disclosed is a method of 3D object delineation from 3D seismic data comprising the steps of providing 3D seismic data ( 144,200,300 ; processing the data ( 210,310 ) based on at least one characteristic ( 320 ) whereby said characteristic is extracted from the data and compared with at least one reference characteristic and delineated ( 330 ) based on the comparison, and defining a geological element ( 340 ) based on the delineation. The characteristics ( 320 ) may be adjusted. Data can be processed ( 210,310 ) based on one characteristic ( 222,232 ) then processed based on a second characteristic ( 224,234 ) or data is processed based on two characteristics substantially simultaneously ( 252 ). Data may be processed n times ( 246 ) producing n delineations from which the geological element is defined ( 260 ). An algorithm is provided for processing the data which may shift an evolving shape description of an object between explicit ( 222,234 ) and implicit ( 224,232 ) representations, where each shift applies a transformation to the object. Multiple sources of data ( 200,200′, 200 ″) may be utilised simultaneously to drive the delineation process.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modified1 . A method of 3D object delineation from 3D seismic data comprising the steps of:
a) providing 3D seismic data ( 144 , 200 , 300 ); b) processing the data ( 210 , 310 ) based on a first characteristic ( 320 ) wherein, said first characteristic is extracted from the data and compared with at least one reference characteristic so as to define a set of object data; c) delineating the object data according to a first delineation technique ( 330 ); d) transforming the delineated object data using a second delineation technique so as to obtain a set of improved object data; e) extracting object data from the improved object data set; and f) repeating steps b) to e) using the extracted object data, until desired criteria are reached, so as to define a region of interest ( 340 ).
2 . A method according to claim 1 wherein the first delineation technique includes active contour delineation; and the second delineation technique is level set segmentation; the region of interest ( 340 ) being defined is a geological element.
3 . A method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein, the characteristics ( 320 ) include colour, texture, intensity, energy, phase, frequency and mufti-spectral attributes.
4 . A method according to any of claims 1 to 3 wherein, the data is processed ( 210 , 310 ) based on one characteristic ( 222 , 232 ) to produce a first delineation and then the first delineation is processed based on a second characteristic ( 224 , 234 ) to provide a second delineation from which the region of interest is defined ( 260 ).
5 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein, the data is processed ( 210 , 310 ) based on multiple characteristics that are used to produce multiple delineations.
6 . A method according to claim 5 wherein, the multiple delineations are used to define simultaneously a geological element and uncertainty properties for direct inclusion in a reservoir model.
7 . A method according to claim 5 wherein, the multiple delineations are provided directly to a user of the system for manual usage.
8 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein, the data is processed n times ( 246 ) producing n delineations from which the geological element is defined ( 260 ).
9 . A method according to any of claims 5 to 8 wherein, the data is processed based on two characteristics substantially simultaneously ( 252 ).
10 . A method according to claim 1 or claim 3 wherein, the data is processed ( 210 , 310 ) based on one characteristic to produce a delineation from which a geological element is defined.
11 . A method according to any proceeding claim wherein, the at least one characteristic ( 320 ) is adjusted during data processing ( 310 ) to guide the delineation process.
12 . A method according to claim 11 wherein, the at least one characteristic ( 320 ) and/or delineation ( 330 ) is adjusted based on statistical probability either using user expertise or a data model ( 350 ) that is accessed or used simultaneously.
13 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein an algorithm is provided for processing the data.
14 . A method according to claim 13 wherein, the algorithm transitions an evolving shape description of an object between explicit domain ( 222 , 234 ) and implicit domain ( 224 , 232 ) representations, where each transition applies a transformation to the object.
15 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein, multiple sources of data ( 200 , 200 ′, 200 ″) are utilised simultaneously to drive the delineation process.
16 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein, a statistically driven ‘direction of least resistance’ is utilised to further improve capability and performance of the technique in a number of common 3D delineation scenarios.
17 . A method according to any preceding claim wherein an expert driven ‘skeleton relative forces’ method is utilised to provide additional expertise that is incorporated within the delineation.
18 . A method according to claim 17 wherein expert driven and statistically driven methods are utilised simultaneously.
19 . A system for carrying out the method of 3D object delineation according to any of claims 1 to 18 includes at least one database that stores 3D imaging data ( 144 , 200 , 300 ); a processor for processing the data ( 210 , 310 ); an output means for displaying object data and a region of interest; and an input device, such as a man machine interface, that enables an operator to operate the system.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2014044316A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.