Diesel eission fluid quality detection system and method
Abstract
An exhaust treatment system is provided including: a selective catalyst reduction (SCR) unit; a reducing agent dispensing unit configured to introduce a reducing agent into the exhaust; a first NO X sensor upstream of the SCR unit; a second NO X sensor at a location downstream of the SCR unit; a first temperature sensor at a location upstream of where the reducing agent is introduced into the exhaust; a second temperature sensor at a location downstream of where the reducing agent is introduced into the exhaust and upstream of the SCR unit; and a controller configured to determine a reductant quality indicator according to a NO X differential between the first NO X sensor and the second NO X sensor relative to a predicted NO X differential and a temperature differential between the first temperature sensor and the second temperature sensor relative to a predicted temperature differential.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWhat is claimed is:
1 . An exhaust treatment system for treating a flow of exhaust produced by an engine comprising:
a selective catalyst reduction (SCR) unit; a reducing agent dispensing unit configured to introduce a reducing agent into the exhaust; a first NO X sensor configured to indicate a NO X emission level of the exhaust at a location upstream of the SCR unit; a second NO X sensor configured to indicate a NO X emission level of the exhaust at a location downstream of the SCR unit; a first temperature sensor configured to indicate a temperature of the exhaust at a location upstream of where the reducing agent is introduced into the exhaust; a second temperature sensor configured to indicate a temperature of the exhaust at a location downstream of where the reducing agent is introduced into the exhaust and upstream of the SCR unit; and a controller configured to electronically communicate with the first NO X sensor, the second NO X sensor, the first temperature sensor, and the second temperature sensor, and to determine a reductant quality indicator according to a NO X differential between the first NO X sensor and the second NO X sensor relative to a predicted NO X differential and a temperature differential between the first temperature sensor and the second temperature sensor relative to a predicted temperature differential.
2 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 1 , further comprising a filter, and wherein the first NO X sensor is configured to indicate a NO X level of the exhaust downstream of the filter.
3 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 2 , wherein the filter is a diesel particulate filter (DPF).
4 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 2 , further comprising generating a signal when the reductant quality indicator is not within a tolerance level.
5 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 2 , wherein the reducing agent is urea.
6 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 5 , wherein the controller is configured to generate a first signal indicating that the reducing agent has a low urea concentration when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is approximately equal to the predicted temperature differential.
7 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 5 , wherein the controller is configured to generate a second signal indicating a likelihood of a clogged injector when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is lower than the predicted temperature differential.
8 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 5 , wherein the controller is configured to generate a third signal indicating a likelihood of an injection failure when the NO X differential is approximately zero and the temperature differential is approximately zero.
9 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 5 , wherein the controller is configured to generate a fourth signal indicating that the reducing agent is likely diesel when the NO X differential is moderately lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is higher than the predicted temperature differential.
10 . The exhaust treatment system of claim 5 , wherein the controller is configured to:
generate a first signal indicating that the reducing agent has a low urea concentration when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is approximately equal to the predicted temperature differential; generate a second signal indicating likely clogged injector when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is lower than the predicted temperature differential; generate a third signal indicating likely injection failure when the NO X differential is approximately zero and the temperature differential is approximately zero; and generate a fourth signal indicating that the reducing agent is likely diesel when the NO X differential is moderately lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is higher than the predicted temperature differential.
11 . A method for detecting a reducing agent quality comprising:
obtaining a first NO X value indicating a NO X level for an engine exhaust upstream of a selective catalyst reduction (SCR) unit; obtaining a second NO X value indicating a NO X emission level for the engine exhaust downstream of the SCR unit; obtaining a first temperature value indicating a temperature for the engine exhaust upstream of an introduction of a reducing agent; obtaining a second temperature value indicating a temperature for the engine exhaust downstream of the introduction of the reducing agent and upstream of the SCR unit; and computing a reductant quality indicator according to a NO X differential between the first NO X value and the second NO X value relative to a predicted NO X differential and a temperature differential between the first temperature value and the second temperature value relative to a predicted temperature differential.
12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the first NO X value further indicates a NO X level for the engine exhaust after treatment by a filter.
13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising generating a signal when the reductant quality indicator indicated is not within a tolerance level.
14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising adjusting a rate at which the reducing agent is injected into the exhaust according to the reductant quality indicator.
15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the reducing agent is urea.
16 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising generating a first signal indicating that the reducing agent has a low urea concentration when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is approximately equal to the predicted temperature differential.
17 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising generating a second signal indicating likely clogged injector when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is lower than the predicted temperature differential.
18 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising generating a third signal indicating likely injection failure when the NO X differential is approximately zero and the temperature differential is approximately zero.
19 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising generating a fourth signal indicating that the reducing agent is likely diesel when the NO X differential is moderately lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is higher than the predicted temperature differential.
20 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
generating a first signal indicating that the reducing agent has a low urea concentration when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is approximately equal to the predicted temperature differential; generating a second signal indicating likely clogged injector when the NO X differential is lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is lower than the predicted temperature differential; generating a third signal indicating likely injection failure when the NO X differential is approximately zero and the temperature differential is approximately zero; and generating a fourth signal indicating that the reducing agent is likely diesel when the NO X differential is moderately lower than the predicted NO X differential and the temperature differential is higher than the predicted temperature differential.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2013152545A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.