US2007290442A1PendingUtilityA1
Method for Wagering in Blackjack
Individually held — no corporate assignee on recordPriority: Jun 19, 2006Filed: Aug 30, 2006Published: Dec 20, 2007
Est. expiryJun 19, 2026(expired)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
Inventors:Joseph Lemberg
A63F 2001/003A63F 3/00157
45
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims
Abstract
A side wager for a standard blackjack game. After a player is dealt his initial two cards, if the two cards comprise a straight, the player is paid. Different ranks of straights can have different payouts. Suited straights can pay more than non-suited straights. Lower ranking straights can have higher payoffs than higher ranking straights.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modified1 . A method to resolve a side wager for a blackjack game, the method comprising:
receiving a main wager and a side wager; dealing a player two cards; determining if the two cards comprise a straight; if the two cards comprise a straight, then paying the player an award based on the side wager, wherein if the straight is unsuited then the award is a first amount, if the straight is suited, then the award is a second amount, the second amount being higher than the first amount; and continuing the blackjack game.
2 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the second amount is a multiple of the first amount.
3 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the award varies depending on a rank of the straight.
4 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein winning two card combinations comprise the following:
non suited straights comprising non suited A/2; non suited 2/3; non suited 3/4; non suited 4/5; non suited 5/6; non suited 6/7; non suited 7/8; non suited 8/9; non suited 9/10; non suited 10/J; non suited J/Q; non suited Q/K; non suited K/A; and
suited straights comprising suited A/2; suited 2/3; suited 3/4; suited 4/5; suited 5/6; suited 6/7; suited 7/8; suited 8/9; suited 9/10; suited 10/J; suited J/Q; suited Q/K; suited K/A, wherein the award is higher for all of the suited straights than the same ranking nonsuited straights.
5 . The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein the award for non suited 4/5 is higher than the award for non suited 9/10.
6 . A method to resolve a side wager for a blackjack game, the method comprising:
receiving a main wager and a side wager; dealing a player two cards; determining if the two cards comprise a straight; if the two cards comprise a straight, then paying the player an award based on the side wager, wherein if the straight is a first rank then the award is a first amount, if the straight is a second rank, then the award is a second amount, the second amount being different than the first amount; and continuing the blackjack game.
7 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein if the straight is suited, then the award pays more than if the straight is not suited.
8 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein if the straight is suited, then the award pays a multiple of a corresponding award of the straight were not suited.
9 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the award for non suited 4/5 is higher than the award for non suited 9/10.
10 . A method to resolve a side wager for a blackjack game, the method comprising:
receiving a main wager and a side wager; dealing a player two cards; determining if the two cards comprise a two card straight; if the two cards comprise a two card straight, then paying the player an award based on the side wager; and continuing the blackjack game.
11 . A method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the determining determines whether the two cards are one of: 2/3; 3/4; 4/5; 5/6; 6/7; 7/8; 8/9; 9/10; 10/J; J/Q; Q/K, and if so then the player wins the side wager otherwise the player loses.
12 . A method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the determining determines whether the two cards are one of: A/2; 2/3; 3/4; 4/5; 5/6; 6/7; 7/8; 8/9; 9/10; 10/J; J/Q; Q/K, and if so then the player wins the side wager otherwise the player loses.
13 . A method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the determining determines whether the two cards are one of: 2/3; 3/4; 4/5; 5/6; 6/7; 7/8; 8/9; 9/10; 10/J; J/Q; Q/K; K/A; and if so then the player wins the side wager otherwise the player loses.
14 . A method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the determining determines whether the two cards are one of: A/2; 2/3; 3/4; 4/5; 5/6; 6/7; 7/8; 8/9; 9/10; 10/J; J/Q; Q/K; K/A, and if so then the player wins the side wager otherwise the player loses.
15 . A method as recited in claim 11 , wherein if the two cards are suited then the player wins a higher award than if the two cards were not suited.
16 . A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein if the two cards are suited then the player wins a higher award than if the two cards were not suited.
17 . A method as recited in claim 13 , wherein if the two cards are suited then the player wins a higher award than if the two cards were not suited.
18 . A method as recited in claim 14 , wherein if the two cards are suited then the player wins a higher award than if the two cards were not suited.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2007290442A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.