Quality-control method for wire/rod rolling system
Abstract
Quality of a wire or rod is controlled in a rolling mill having a succession of roll stands spaced apart in a workpiece-travel direction by a method having the first step of, before rolling a wire or rod, statically measuring a sample of at least one wire or rod with typical real roll flaws and storing the flaw data in standard format in a control computer. A single cross-sectional shape or, if there is noise, an average of a plurality of averaged cross-sectional shapes are stored standardized as polar coordinates. During actual rolling of a wire or rod its actual-shape is continuously measured and actual-shape data is generated. A similarity analysis is continuously effected by comparing the flaw data in standard format with the actual-shape data of the wire or rod being rolled. When the actual cross-sectional shape data corresponds to the flaw data, an alarm is generated.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modified1 . A quality-control method for wire or rod in a computer-controlled rolling mill having a succession of roll stands spaced apart in a workpiece-travel direction, the method comprising the steps of:
before rolling a wire or rod, at least one sample wire or rod with typical real roll flaws is measured statically and flaw data in standard format is stored in a control computer, a single cross-sectional shape or, if there is noise, an average of a plurality of averaged cross-sectional shapes being stored standardized as polar coordinates; during rolling of a wire or rod continuously measuring its actual-shape and generating actual-shape data corresponding thereto; continuously effecting a similarity analysis by comparing the flaw data in standard format with the actual-shape data of the wire or rod being rolled; and when the actual cross-sectional shape data corresponds to the flaw data, generating an alarm.
2 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 , further comprising the step of:
storing and standardizing the actual-shape data prior to comparing it with the flaw data.
3 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 , further comprising the step of
displaying a difference between the actual cross-sectional data and the flaw data.
4 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 , further comprising the step of
measuring the temperature of the rod or wire being rolled.
5 . The quality-control method defined in claim 4 wherein the actual-shape data is corrected to correspond to a cross-sectional shape the rod or wire would have at about 20° C.
6 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein the rod or wire shape is measured by lasers.
7 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein at least 38 angularly generally equispaced measurements of the rod or wire radius are made to determine its cross-sectional shape.
8 . The quality-control method defined in claim 7 wherein 180 such angularly generally equispaced measurements are made.
9 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein the determine radius portions of the wire or rod a Fourier analysis is used.
10 . The quality-control method defined in claim 9 wherein a Fast Fourier analysis is used.
11 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein to determine radius portions a fitting method of the actual cross section is used.
12 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein minimum and maximum diameters of the wire or rod are measured at locations along its length to develop the actual-shape data.
13 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 , further comprising generating a signal representing ovalness of the rod or wire.
14 . The quality-control method defined in claim 13 wherein ovalness is determined by a triangular method.
15 . The quality-control method defined in claim 13 wherein ovalness is determined by a hexagonal method.
16 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein the mill includes a set of calibrating roll stands and the wire or rod is measured immediately downstream therefrom.
17 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein the flaw data and actual-shape data are compared by a cross correlation function.
18 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein the flaw data and actual-shape data are compared by a cross covariant function.
19 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 , further comprising
collecting flaw data regarding underfilling and overfilling or roller offset are collected and stored.
20 . The quality-control method defined in claim 1 wherein for each real flaw at least two references are assigned that are set mathematically as vectors and compared with similar references for the wire or rod.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2007227214A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.