"No 1st Cost List" is a privately owned public internet interface for universal information exchange that uses disagreement dialogues to identify any questions and disagreements about the information and goods & services exchanged through the interface

Abstract

This RPA explains this tools scientific background and purpose and it outlines the historical and personal scientific paths that led to the necessity for this invention. It rests on this scientific requirement: True science requires one place where all scientists can meet to disagree on an equal basis. Such a place can exist in theory as described in the “theoretical Premise” section. The RPA outlines the reasons establishments and insiders have resisted such an idea and how they go about it. The RPA shows that mankind has unconsciously been trying build such a place by our building of more and more sophisticated marketplaces. The RPA describes this tools requirements, specifications, advantages, embodiments, and implications; which explain how and why a universal scientific information exchange must work, in order to identify all questions and disagreements about anything exchanged through the Interface.

1 . A “No 1st Cost List” is a privately owned Public Internet Interface for universal information exchange that uses Disagreement Dialogues to identify any questions and disagreements about the information and goods & services exchanged through the Internet Interface, comprising; 
 (a) an Internet web-site named the No !st Cost List(n1cl.com),  
 (b) open to all on an equal basis,  
 (c) no prior restraint on speech,  
 (d) an agreement by this Interface's members to answer questions from anyone about what they say, sell, or solicit, or place on the public record of this Interface,  
 (e) an agreement by anyone who asks questions of a member to respond to the member until both parties to the dialogue agree to agree or disagree,  
 (f) an agreement by the member to respond to the questioner until they reach an explicit agreement to agree or disagree,  
 (g) an agreement by both parties to a dialogue to abide by the pre-defined Rules of Response and accept the automatic consequences of violating these Rules of Response,  
 (h) software that automatically enforces the constraints defined by the agreements above upon any parties to the dialogues that violate the Rules of Response,  
 (i) the computers, databases, memory, and software needed to remember, track, and automatically remind parties to dialogues whose turn it is,  
 (j) it will be owned, regulated, and exclusively controlled by its members users, who have agreed to maintain it to “specs” listed in the N1CL constitution, application, and agreements, on a one member one vote basis,  
 the improvement wherein said Public Internet Interface for universal information exchange has never been done before, nor have such procedural agreements enforced by software design been used in an open to all Public Internet Interface for universal information exchange on the Internet before.  
 
     
     
         2 . A Public Internet Interface for universal information exchange of  claim 1 . can be modified in the following manner: 
 (a) a Dialogue can be conducted by subsets of all possible users, e.gs. all members of a union, or all men and women over age 25 can conduct Dialogues using all elements (a) through (h) except that (b) is modified to “open to a (pre-defined x characteristics kind of persons) on an equal basis.    (b) these sub-set dialogues can be conducted in public or private.    
     
     
         3 . A Public Internet Interface for universal information exchange of  claim 1 . can be modified in the following manner: 
 (a) use disagreements identified on the N1CL public record to,    (b) let persons make proposals on the public record of the N1CL to resolve said disagreements,    (c) by using an anonymous paid voting mechanism that decides proposals,    (d) takes proceeds from voting awards them to winning side by dividing them by a pre-determined formula among the proposers, parties to the disagreement and authors of reasons given by voters.