US2003139833A1PendingUtilityA1
Methods and apparatus for determining optimum exposure threshold for a given photolithographic model
Est. expiryFeb 5, 2018(expired)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
H10P 74/23G03F 7/70558C09K 8/42C09K 8/508C09K 8/80
42
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims
Abstract
A system and method for enhancing process latitude (tolerances) in the fabrication of devices and integrated circuits. A measuring point is selected corresponding to a feature of critical dimension. Then the pattern is convolved with the model, and its value and rate of change are calculated over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter. Next, an optimum threshold having the largest rate of change, or contrast, is selected. Finally, proximity correction is performed using relevant parameters.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWe claim:
1 . A method, in a computer, for determining the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising the steps of:
selecting a measuring point on a computer representation of a wafer corresponding to the feature of the critical dimension; calculating modeled behavior values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter; selecting an optimum threshold value having the largest rate of change around said measuring point; and determining the first process parameter value corresponding to the optimum threshold value.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of mask material edge position.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of focus.
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of numerical aperture.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating comprises the steps of:
selecting a point on one side of the measuring point; calculating a value of the modeled behavior at each of the points; and calculating a slope through each of the points, wherein the slope is a function of the values of the modeled behavior at each point.
6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the step of calculating model values further comprises selecting a second point.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating threshold values and their rates of change comprises the steps of:
decrementing the value of the first process parameter; calculating the value of the modeled behavior at the measuring point; determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the measuring point in a first direction by a second value; determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the initial position in a second direction, opposite to the first direction, by the second value; and calculating the rate of change of the modeled behavior corresponding to the first process parameter value.
8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the step of calculating the rate of change comprises the steps of:
calculating a difference of the modeled behavior values ascertained during the steps of determining the values; and dividing the difference of the modeled behavior values by twice the second value.
9 . A method, in a computer, for determining the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising the steps of:
selecting a measuring point on a computer representation of a wafer corresponding to the feature of the critical dimension; calculating modeled behavior values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter; selecting an optimum threshold value having the largest rate of change around said measuring point; determining the first process parameter value corresponding to the optimum threshold value; and providing the optimum threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of a mask.
11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of mask material edge position.
12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of focus.
13 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of calculating model values comprises the step of calculating the model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter representative of numerical aperture.
14 . A method, in a computer, for determining the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising the steps of:
selecting a measuring point on a computer representation of a wafer corresponding to the feature of the critical dimension; calculating model values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding mask material edge positions; and selecting an optimum threshold value having the largest rate of change around said measuring point.
15 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising the step of determining the mask material edge position corresponding to the optimum threshold value.
16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the step of calculating comprises the steps of:
selecting a point on one side of the measuring point; calculating a value of the modeled behavior at each of the points; and calculating a slope through each of the points, wherein the slope is a function of the values of the modeled behavior at each point.
17 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the step of calculating threshold values and their rates of change further compromises the steps of:
shifting the mask material edge position by a first value; calculating the value of the modeled behavior at the measuring point; determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the measuring point in a first direction by a second value; determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the measuring point in a second direction, opposite the first direction, by the second value; and calculating the rate of change of the threshold corresponding to the mask material edge position.
18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the step of calculating the rate of change comprises the steps of:
calculating a difference of the modeled behavior values ascertained during the steps of determining the values; and dividing the difference of the modeled behavior values by twice the second value.
19 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising the steps of:
providing the optimum threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
20 . A method, in a computer, for determining the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising the steps of:
selecting a measuring point on a computer representation of a wafer corresponding to the feature of the critical dimension; calculating modeled behavior values and their rates of change over a range of corresponding mask material edge positions, comprising the steps of:
shifting the mask material edge position by a first value;
calculating the value of the modeled behavior at the measuring point;
determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the measuring point in a first direction by a second value;
determining the value of the modeled behavior at a location offset from the measuring point in a second direction, opposite the first direction, by the second value; and
calculating the rate of change of the threshold, comprising the steps of:
calculating a difference of the modeled behavior values ascertained during the steps of determining the values; and
dividing the difference of the modeled behavior values by twice the second value;
selecting an optimum threshold value having the largest rate of change; and providing the optimum threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
21 . A method, in a computer, for determining the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of critical dimension, comprising the steps of:
selecting a plurality of measuring points, wherein each measuring point corresponds to the feature of the critical dimension; calculating values and rates of change of modeled behavior over a range of values of a first process parameter for each measuring point; selecting an optimum threshold value having the largest rate of change for each measuring point; selecting a threshold value from the plurality of optimal threshold values; and providing the selected threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
22 . The method according to claim 21 , wherein the step of selecting an optimum threshold value includes the step of determining the mean of the selected optimum threshold values.
23 . The method according to claim 21 , wherein the step of selecting an optimum threshold value includes the step of determining the median of the selected optimum threshold values.
24 . A computer program product comprising a memory having computer program logic recorded thereon for enabling a processor in a computer system to determine the optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, the computer program logic comprising:
a first calculating process enabling the processor to calculate a modeled behavior value associated with the device feature and a rate of change of the modeled behavior value over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter; a second calculating process enabling the processor to select an optimum threshold value; and a determining process enabling the processor to determine the value of the first process parameter corresponding to the optimum threshold value.
25 . The computer program product of claim 24 , further comprising:
a providing process enabling the processor to provide the optimum threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
26 . The computer program according to claim 24 , wherein the first process parameter is a mask material edge position and the rate of change of the modeled behavior value indicates the process latitude in forming the device feature associated with a particular mask material edge position.
27 . A computer system, comprising:
a processor; a memory operatively coupled to the processor; a first calculating process enabling the processor to calculate a modeled behavior value associated with the device feature and a rate of change of the modeled behavior value over a range of corresponding values of a first process parameter; a second calculating process enabling the processor to select the optimum threshold value; and a determining process enabling the processor to determine the value of the first process parameter corresponding to the optimum threshold value.
28 . The computer system of claim 27 , further comprising the step of providing process enabling the processor to provide the optimum threshold value to a proximity effect correction process which modifies the mask pattern to compensate for proximity effects.
29 . The computer system of claim 27 , wherein the first process parameter is a mask edge position and the rate of change of the modeled value indicates the process latitude of an edge of the device feature.
30 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of mask material edge positions; and calculating rates of change of model values over a range of the mask material edge positions.
31 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of process parameters representative of focus; and calculating rates of change of model values over a range of the process parameters representative of focus.
32 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of process parameters representative of numerical aperture; and calculating rates of change of model values over a range of the process parameters representative of numerical aperture.
33 . A simulation method, comprising:
simulating a processing step for a wafer; calculating model values and their rates of change over a range of values of a processing parameter; determining an optimum value having a largest calculated rate of change; and determining the process parameter corresponding to the optimum value.
34 . The method of claim 33 , wherein simulating the processing step includes simulating an exposure step.
35 . The method of claim 33 , wherein simulating the processing step includes simulating a development step.
36 . The method of claim 33 , wherein simulating the processing step includes simulating an etch step.
37 . The method of claim 33 , wherein simulating the processing step includes selecting an initial position of a simulated mask material edge.
38 . The method of claim 37 , wherein simulating the processing step includes defining a critical dimension of a device feature.
39 . The method of claim 38 , wherein calculating the model value includes selecting a measuring point.
40 . The method of claim 39 , wherein calculating the model value includes selecting a threshold to create an edge that includes the measuring point.
41 . The method of claim 33 , wherein determining the process parameter includes providing the optimum value to a proximity effect correction model.
42 . The method of claim 41 , wherein determining the process parameter includes modifying the process parameter to compensate for proximity effects.
43 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of attenuated phase shift mask material edge positions; and calculating rates of change of model values over the range of the attenuated phase shift mask material edge positions.
44 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of alternating aperture phase shift mask material edge positions; and calculating rates of change of model values over the range of the alternating aperture phase shift mask material edge positions.
45 . A simulation method for determining an optimum process point for fabricating a device feature of a critical dimension, comprising:
calculating model values over a range of chromeless phase shift mask material edge positions; and calculating rates of change of model values over the range of the chromeless phase shift mask material edge positions.
46 . A simulation method, comprising:
simulating a lithography processing step for a substrate; calculating model values and their rates of change over a range of values of a processing parameter; determining an optimum value having a largest calculated rate of change; and determining the process parameter corresponding to the optimum value.
47 . The method of claim 46 , wherein determining the process parameter includes providing the optimum value to a proximity effect correction model.
48 . The method of claim 47 , wherein determining the process parameter includes modifying the process parameter to compensate for proximity effects.
49 . The method of claim 46 , wherein simulating a lithography processing step for a substrate includes simulating X-ray lithography.
50 . The method of claim 46 , wherein simulating a lithography processing step for a substrate includes simulating ion beam lithography.
51 . The method of claim 46 , wherein simulating a lithography processing step for a substrate includes simulating electron beam lithography.Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Track US2003139833A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.