Assignee
TITAN TOOL CO
US·13 granted patents·134 citations·filing 1980–1999
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
13 records- 0172US4371354AControlled-torque apparatusTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1980·Granted Feb 1, 1983·20 cites·7 claims
- 0265US4513643AAutomatic stud driving toolTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1983·Granted Apr 30, 1985·21 cites·17 claims
- 0356US4590826ACombination stud driving tool and torque limiting deviceTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1983·Granted May 27, 1986·15 cites·17 claims
- 0453US6009775AWrench with high inertia torque system and method for using sameTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1999·Granted Jan 4, 2000·15 cites·13 claims
- 0548US4476749AAutomatic stud driverTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1984·Granted Oct 16, 1984·12 cites·5 claims
- 0647US5299473AStud driver and remover for large diameter studsTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1993·Granted Apr 5, 1994·11 cites·4 claims
- 0742US5301573AStud driver and remover for studs having non-grip areaTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1993·Granted Apr 12, 1994·11 cites·13 claims
- 0836US5277084AStud driver and remover for large diameter studsTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1992·Granted Jan 11, 1994·7 cites·18 claims
- 0933US5119700AAutomatic stud driving tool having collarless retention mechanism for driven headTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1991·Granted Jun 9, 1992·6 cites·21 claims
- 1031US5970824AWrench with high inertia torque system and method for using sameTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1996·Granted Oct 26, 1999·4 cites·29 claims
- 1131US5690004AStud driver and remover having core relief recess preventing the stud from being jammed in coreTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1996·Granted Nov 25, 1997·5 cites·3 claims
- 1230US4470329AAutomatic stud driving toolTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1982·Granted Sep 11, 1984·4 cites·8 claims
- 1329US4819519AAutomatic stud driver having thread relief for high torque applicationsTITAN TOOL CO·Filed 1988·Granted Apr 11, 1989·3 cites·16 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when TITAN TOOL CO files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →