Assignee
SINGH SATNAM
IN·11 granted patents·2 pending applications·156 citations·filing 2005–2011
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
13 records- 0190US8732112B2Method and system for root cause analysis and quality monitoring of system-level faultsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2011·Granted May 20, 2014·14 cites·20 claims
- 0289US8996235B2Repair assist system for vehicle servicingSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2011·Granted Mar 31, 2015·37 cites·20 claims
- 0389US8301333B2Event-driven fault diagnosis framework for automotive systemsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2010·Granted Oct 30, 2012·26 cites·16 claims
- 0488US8527441B2Developing fault model from service proceduresSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2011·Granted Sep 3, 2013·8 cites·20 claims
- 0587US8433472B2Event-driven data mining method for improving fault code settings and isolating faultsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2010·Granted Apr 30, 2013·27 cites·18 claims
- 0683US8498776B2Fault diagnosis and prognosis using diagnostic trouble code markov chainsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2009·Granted Jul 30, 2013·13 cites·20 claims
- 0782US8777278B2Flange assembly with improved serviceabilitySINGH SATNAM·Filed 2009·Granted Jul 15, 2014·11 cites·12 claims
- 0877US8473330B2Software-centric methodology for verification and validation of fault modelsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2009·Granted Jun 25, 2013·4 cites·19 claims
- 0976US8645019B2Graph matching system for comparing and merging fault modelsSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2010·Granted Feb 4, 2014·3 cites·20 claims
- 1064US9740993B2Detecting anomalies in field failure dataSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2009·Granted Aug 22, 2017·3 cites·22 claims
- 1153USD524048SDouble door tool caseSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2005·Granted Jul 4, 2006·10 cites·1 claims
- 1245US2012006705A1Knife blade containerSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2011·Application pending·0 cites
- 1340US2007071565A1Hole saw mandrelSINGH SATNAM·Filed 2006·Application pending·0 cites
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when SINGH SATNAM files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →