Assignee
SHAW STROZ LLC
US·6 granted patents·145 citations·filing 2003–2009
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
6 records- 0194US7395201B2System and method for computer analysis of computer generated communications to produce indications and warning of dangerous behaviorSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2007·Granted Jul 1, 2008·37 cites·9 claims
- 0293US7225122B2System and method for computer analysis of computer generated communications to produce indications and warning of dangerous behaviorSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2005·Granted May 29, 2007·30 cites·82 claims
- 0392US7346492B2System and method for computerized psychological content analysis of computer and media generated communications to produce communications management support, indications, and warnings of dangerous behavior, assessment of media images, and personnel selection supportSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2003·Granted Mar 18, 2008·50 cites·71 claims
- 0489US7881924B2System and method for computer analysis of computer generated communications to produce indications and warning of dangerous behaviorSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2008·Granted Feb 1, 2011·17 cites·60 claims
- 0579US7801724B2System and method for computerized psychological content analysis of computer and media generated communications to produce communications management support, indications and warnings of dangerous behavior, assessment of media images, and personnel selection supportSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2009·Granted Sep 21, 2010·6 cites·41 claims
- 0679US7526426B2System and method for computerized psychological content analysis of computer and media generated communications to produce communications management support, indications and warnings of dangerous behavior, assessment of media images, and personnel selection supportSHAW STROZ LLC·Filed 2008·Granted Apr 28, 2009·5 cites·68 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when SHAW STROZ LLC files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →