Assignee
EDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO
US·13 granted patents·392 citations·filing 1984–1994
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
13 records- 0194US5005922ADouble V-shaped endless track drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1989·Granted Apr 9, 1991·71 cites·31 claims
- 0287US5482364AReplacement endless vehicle tracksEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1993·Granted Jan 9, 1996·59 cites·21 claims
- 0386US5511869AReplacement endless vehicle tracksEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1994·Granted Apr 30, 1996·55 cites·19 claims
- 0480US5005921AEndless track drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1989·Granted Apr 9, 1991·35 cites·19 claims
- 0571US4861120AModular endless track drive system and methods of making, installing and repairing sameEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1987·Granted Aug 29, 1989·24 cites·55 claims
- 0670US5020865AEndless drive track joint assemblyEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1988·Granted Jun 4, 1991·25 cites·26 claims
- 0768US5368376AReplacement endless vehicle tracksEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1992·Granted Nov 29, 1994·29 cites·34 claims
- 0868US4616883AEndless drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1985·Granted Oct 14, 1986·24 cites·23 claims
- 0963US4569561AEndless drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1984·Granted Feb 11, 1986·17 cites·44 claims
- 1055US4844560AEndless drive track joint assemblyEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1988·Granted Jul 4, 1989·15 cites·30 claims
- 1152US4906054AEndless track drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1987·Granted Mar 6, 1990·13 cites·36 claims
- 1252US4884852ADouble V-shaped endless track drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1988·Granted Dec 5, 1989·13 cites·33 claims
- 1349US5040282AMethod of making a modular endless track drive systemEDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO·Filed 1989·Granted Aug 20, 1991·12 cites·13 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when EDWARDS HARPER MCNEW & CO files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →