Individual holder
DEAL TROY M
14 granted patents·208 citations·filing 1975–1988
Individually held — no corporate assignee on record.
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
14 records- 0178US4896445AMethod for reducing costs and environmental impact of dredgingDEAL TROY M·Filed 1984·Granted Jan 30, 1990·27 cites·5 claims
- 0278US3971148ADredge cutter headDEAL TROY M·Filed 1975·Granted Jul 27, 1976·24 cites·5 claims
- 0374US4521305ARotating self-cleaning screenDEAL TROY M·Filed 1984·Granted Jun 4, 1985·31 cites·4 claims
- 0468US4631844AHydraulic shovel dredge systemDEAL TROY M·Filed 1985·Granted Dec 30, 1986·22 cites·6 claims
- 0568US4217212AMethod of pumping and processing phosphate slime for land reclamationDEAL TROY M·Filed 1978·Granted Aug 12, 1980·17 cites·4 claims
- 0667US4628623ATurbidity control system for dredge cutterheadsDEAL TROY M·Filed 1985·Granted Dec 16, 1986·21 cites·15 claims
- 0759US4759664AMethod of building or restoring marshes and beachesDEAL TROY M·Filed 1985·Granted Jul 26, 1988·16 cites·16 claims
- 0856US4608179AContinuous process for the dewatering of phosphate slimesDEAL TROY M·Filed 1985·Granted Aug 26, 1986·18 cites·11 claims
- 0945US4246862ASelf-cleaning weedless propellerDEAL TROY M·Filed 1979·Granted Jan 27, 1981·7 cites·1 claims
- 1043US4808304AApparatus for the dewatering of phosphate slimesDEAL TROY M·Filed 1988·Granted Feb 28, 1989·10 cites·7 claims
- 1140US4434943APump intake cutter headDEAL TROY M·Filed 1982·Granted Mar 6, 1984·6 cites·1 claims
- 1239US4575960ADredge cutterheadDEAL TROY M·Filed 1984·Granted Mar 18, 1986·6 cites·2 claims
- 1333US4240243AIntake balancing and satellite collector systemDEAL TROY M·Filed 1979·Granted Dec 23, 1980·3 cites·1 claims
- 1429US4517754ACutterhead attachment for a dredgeDEAL TROY M·Filed 1984·Granted May 21, 1985·0 cites·12 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when DEAL TROY M files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →