Assignee
COCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS
CA·5 granted patents·4 pending applications·32 citations·filing 2005–2014
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
9 records- 0187US8116076B2Vibration and shock control protective enclosures for hard disk drives and arrays thereofCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2008·Granted Feb 14, 2012·19 cites·9 claims
- 0275US8066559B2In-plane airflow circulation contingency and control systemCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2006·Granted Nov 29, 2011·6 cites·10 claims
- 0373US8541696B2EMI-shielding solutions for computer enclosures using combinations of two and three-dimensional shapes formed in sheet metalCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2008·Granted Sep 24, 2013·5 cites·13 claims
- 0464US9345183B2EMI-shielding solutions for electronics enclosures using opposing three-dimensional shapes and channels formed in sheet metalCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2009·Granted May 17, 2016·2 cites·4 claims
- 0554US8399780B2EMI-shielding solutions for computer enclosures using combinations of two and three-dimensional shapes formed in sheet metalCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2011·Granted Mar 19, 2013·0 cites·6 claims
- 0649US2016174420A1Formed channels providing electromagnetic shielding in electronicsCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2014·Application pending·0 cites
- 0741US2011096494A1Hard disk drive vibration and shock dampening using polymer springsCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2005·Application pending·0 cites
- 0840US2012285738A1Shielding Polymers Formed into Lattices Providing EMI Protection for Electronics EnclosuresCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2010·Application pending·0 cites
- 0935US2011083895A1Three-Dimensional Shapes with multiple Parametric geometries and Surfaces Formed in Electronics Enclosures for Providing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) ShieldingCOCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS·Filed 2010·Application pending·0 cites
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when COCHRANE PAUL DOUGLAS files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →