Assignee
SOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC
US·12 granted patents·3,529 citations·filing 1992–1998
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
12 records- 0199US5522899AArtificial spinal fusion implantsSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1995·Granted Jun 4, 1996·1.8k cites·4 claims
- 0298USD377095SInterbody spinal implantSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1994·Granted Dec 31, 1996·101 cites·1 claims
- 0398USD377096SInterbody spinal implantSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1994·Granted Dec 31, 1996·90 cites·1 claims
- 0489US5490860APortable power cutting toolSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1993·Granted Feb 13, 1996·610 cites·5 claims
- 0586US6016727ARecess drive bone screw and cooperable driving toolSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1998·Granted Jan 25, 2000·384 cites·21 claims
- 0676USD388877SCranial bone plateSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1994·Granted Jan 6, 1998·17 cites·1 claims
- 0773US5814048ACranioplasty plates and method of installationSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1996·Granted Sep 29, 1998·137 cites·12 claims
- 0873USD381694SIdentification tag for metallic implantable bone fracture reduction and fixation devicesSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1995·Granted Jul 29, 1997·18 cites·1 claims
- 0972US5425376AMethod and apparatus for obtaining a biopsy sampleSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1993·Granted Jun 20, 1995·162 cites·15 claims
- 1064US5769637ADental implant and alveolar process augmentation structures and method of installationSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1996·Granted Jun 23, 1998·93 cites·16 claims
- 1154US5456245AFlexible endoscope probe and method of manufactureSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1993·Granted Oct 10, 1995·67 cites·12 claims
- 1241US5411500APortable arthroscope with disposable probeSOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC·Filed 1992·Granted May 2, 1995·31 cites·13 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when SOFAMOR DANEK PROPERTIES INC files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →