Assignee
AETERNA LAB INC
US·8 granted patents·1 pending application·161 citations·filing 1995–2003
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
9 records- 0183US6025334AExtracts of shark cartilage having anti-collagenolytic, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic and anti-tumoral activities; process of making, methods of using and compositions thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 1995·Granted Feb 15, 2000·62 cites·28 claims
- 0281US6380366B1Shark cartilage extract:process of making, methods of using and compositions thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 2000·Granted Apr 30, 2002·11 cites·29 claims
- 0378US6028118AMethods of using extracts of shark cartilageAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 1996·Granted Feb 22, 2000·53 cites·12 claims
- 0475US6635285B2Shark cartilage extract: process of making, methods of using, and compositions thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 2002·Granted Oct 21, 2003·4 cites·36 claims
- 0566US6855338B2Anti-tumor therapies comprising a combination of a cartilage extract and an anti-neoplastic agent providing high efficacy and low toxic side effectsAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 2002·Granted Feb 15, 2005·2 cites·18 claims
- 0666US6506414B2Low molecular weight components of shark cartilage, processes for their preparation and therapeutic uses thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 2000·Granted Jan 14, 2003·3 cites·15 claims
- 0759US2004081703A1Shark cartilage extract: process of making, methods of using, and compositions thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 2003·Application pending·0 cites
- 0856US6383522B1Toxicity reduced composition containing an anti-neoplastic agent and a shark cartilage extractAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 1999·Granted May 7, 2002·15 cites·16 claims
- 0954US6168807B1Low molecular weight components of shark cartilage, processes for their preparation and therapeutic uses thereofAETERNA LAB INC·Filed 1998·Granted Jan 2, 2001·11 cites·17 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when AETERNA LAB INC files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →