Assignee
DATOTEK
16 granted patents·336 citations·filing 1975–1979
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
16 records- 0190US4349695ARecipient and message authentication method and systemDATOTEK·Filed 1979·Granted Sep 14, 1982·84 cites·7 claims
- 0287US4091423ASynchronous digital data scrambling systemDATOTEK·Filed 1975·Granted May 23, 1978·48 cites·16 claims
- 0378US4229817APortable electronic cryptographic deviceDATOTEK·Filed 1978·Granted Oct 21, 1980·27 cites·35 claims
- 0474US4020285AVoice security method and systemDATOTEK·Filed 1975·Granted Apr 26, 1977·24 cites·8 claims
- 0573US4115657ARandom digital code generatorDATOTEK·Filed 1976·Granted Sep 19, 1978·25 cites·32 claims
- 0673US4079188AMulti-mode digital enciphering systemDATOTEK·Filed 1975·Granted Mar 14, 1978·21 cites·11 claims
- 0770US4133974ASystem for locally enciphering prime dataDATOTEK·Filed 1976·Granted Jan 9, 1979·22 cites·14 claims
- 0858US4185166AMulti-mode digital enciphering systemDATOTEK·Filed 1977·Granted Jan 22, 1980·15 cites·1 claims
- 0957US4133973ADigital cryptographic system having synchronous and asynchronous capabilitiesDATOTEK·Filed 1976·Granted Jan 9, 1979·14 cites·26 claims
- 1056US4140873AMulti-mode digital enciphering systemDATOTEK·Filed 1977·Granted Feb 20, 1979·10 cites·9 claims
- 1152US4278840ADynamic frequency and time voice encryption system and methodDATOTEK·Filed 1979·Granted Jul 14, 1981·11 cites·29 claims
- 1251US4013837AVoice security method and systemDATOTEK·Filed 1975·Granted Mar 22, 1977·10 cites·1 claims
- 1351US3991271AVoice security method and systemDATOTEK·Filed 1975·Granted Nov 9, 1976·10 cites·6 claims
- 1439US4169212AMulti-mode digital enciphering systemDATOTEK·Filed 1977·Granted Sep 25, 1979·7 cites·12 claims
- 1536US4170714ADigital cryptographic system and testing thereofDATOTEK·Filed 1978·Granted Oct 9, 1979·5 cites·2 claims
- 1632US4166922AMulti-mode digital enciphering system with repeated priming sequencesDATOTEK·Filed 1977·Granted Sep 4, 1979·3 cites·8 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →